Skip to main content

Box 44

 Container

Contains 11 Results:

Plaintiff: MLC, 1986

 File — Box: 44, Folders: 1-14
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1986

Defendants: City of L.A., LADWP, 1986-1987

 File — Box: 44, Folders: 15-23
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1986-1987

Amicus curiae: California Attorney General, 1987

 File — Box: 44, Folder: 24
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987

Amicus curiae: California Trout, Inc., 1987

 File — Box: 44, Folder: 25
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987

Court rulings, 1987

 File — Box: 44, Folders: 26-27
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987

Transcript, 1986

 File — Box: 44, Folder: 28
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1986

Agreement, 1990

 File — Box: 44, Folder: 29
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1990

General, 1985-1987

 File — Box: 44, Folder: 30
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1985-1987

Mono Lake Committee, 1985-1989

 File — Box: 44, Folder: 31
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1985-1989

Morrison Foerster, 1986-1988

 File — Box: 44, Folder: 32
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1986-1988