Skip to main content

Box 45

 Container

Contains 27 Results:

Raw data, 1986-1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 11
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1986-1987

Observation notes, 1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 12
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987

Water temperature data, 1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 13
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987

Habitat survey, c. 1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 14
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: c. 1987

Lee Vining Creek Monitoring Program, 1989

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 15
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1989

Flow and weir notes, 1987-1990

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 16
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987-1990

Water use reports (for all Mono Lake streams), 1980-1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 17
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1980-1987

Runoff data (for all Mono Lake streams), 1980-1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 18
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1980-1987

LADWP, Hydrology Reports, 1978-1979

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 19
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1978-1979

LADWP, diversion gauge data, 1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 20
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987