Skip to main content

Box 45

 Container

Contains 27 Results:

LADWP, creek weir notes, 1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 21
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987

DFG study, 1983

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 22
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1983

NonMLC board meeting, 1986

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 23
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1986

Petitions, 1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 24
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987

Correspondence, 1987-1989

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 25
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987-1989

Proposal, 1987

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 26
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1987

Request for Proposal (RFP), 1989

 File — Box: 45, Folder: 27
Sub-Series Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

Brought before the Mono County Superior Courtby the MLC in 1986 on the same grounds as the Rush Creek Lawsuit. The court granted a temporary restraining order that required LADWP to release a flow of up to 10 cfs into Lee Vining Creek. In 1987, the court issued a preliminary injunction that required LADWP to continue to release a flow of 4-5 cfs into Rush Creek to protect public trust resources.

Dates: 1989